Canada’s recent backtracking on its digital services tax (DST) exposes a troubling dynamic in its relationship with the United States—one where economic sovereignty is compromised under the shadow of U.S. economic pressure. Ottawa’s decision to rescind the DST just hours before the first payments were due signals a reactive rather than proactive posture. Rather than
Politics
The recent Senate procedural vote on President Donald Trump’s sprawling domestic spending bill, dubbed the “big, beautiful bill,” was hailed by its architects as a major accomplishment. Yet, beneath the veneer of victory lies a fragile coalition teetering on the brink of collapse. With a razor-thin 51-49 outcome—secured only after weeks of intense lobbying, bipartisan
Thailand’s political landscape is once again on edge with the recent surge of nationalist protests targeting Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra. The demonstration at Victory Monument, emblematic of military valor and national pride, is more than just an expression of dissatisfaction—it signals a dangerous escalation in political tensions. The protestors, coalescing under the United Force of
When Donald Trump brands Zohran Mamdani “a communist” and warns that New York City will become “a communistic city” under his leadership, he’s not just distorting political realities—he’s engaging in dangerous hyperbole that undermines meaningful political discourse. Mamdani is not a communist but a democratic socialist, a faction within the Democratic Party that advocates for
The political landscape surrounding trade in the United States has once again become a breeding ground for uncertainty, courtesy of President Donald Trump’s administration. The recent statements from White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt about the potential extension of tariff pauses illustrate not only the administration’s approach to trade negotiations but also a reflection of
In the tempestuous sea of political chatter surrounding international military interventions, often it becomes a game of perception rather than reality. President Donald Trump’s recent assertions regarding the obliteration of Iran’s nuclear program exemplify this sensationalism. Despite his vehement proclamations that U.S. airstrikes fully annihilated Iran’s capabilities at key nuclear sites, emerging intelligence reports provide
House Speaker Mike Johnson’s recent declarations regarding the War Powers Act represent a troubling and often overlooked aspect of American governance. By labeling this crucial law as unconstitutional, Johnson not only evokes the spirit of executive overreach but also aligns himself with a broader trend that undermines the delicate balance of power established by the
In the wake of the U.S. military operations targeting Iran’s nuclear facilities, President Donald Trump has made headlines by asserting that the damage inflicted was nothing short of “obliteration.” This proclamation reflects not only a penchant for grandiloquent rhetoric but also ignites a contentious debate about the efficacy and ethical ramifications of such military interventions.
In a move that could forever alter the geopolitical landscape, President Donald Trump announced the U.S. had executed a “very successful attack” on Iranian nuclear sites, particularly targeting the Fordo facility. This provocative military action, described by Trump as an “HISTORIC MOMENT,” raises the unsettling prospect of a new wave of violence in an already
Rhode Island, a small but significant state, stands at a critical crossroads as its Democratic-controlled House advances legislation aimed at banning the sale and manufacturing of numerous semiautomatic rifles commonly labeled as “assault weapons.” This legislative action is not just a routine procedure; it embodies the culmination of years of persistent advocacy for gun control,